Brad Wong DOA5U Changes
- Thread starter HoodsXx
- Start date
Seppu
Well-Known Member
no, but he can avoid lows in handstand anyway. i tried all other stance cancels and special moves and they're exactly the same.
i was kind of hoping dho
/ would have some special properties, but it's still completely useless and doesn't even avoid lows, despite being a jumping move.
i was kind of hoping dho
/ would have some special properties, but it's still completely useless and doesn't even avoid lows, despite being a jumping move.
Other issue to add to de long Brad's list...i was kind of hoping dho
On the bad side:
- Brad's became unsafe from -3 in vanilla to -6 in ultimate... What a shame...
- Damage of air throw decrease to 25 from 30 So now it seems other combos do even better damage than:
BT - Damage from many launcher decreased because better juggles of vanilla doesn't connect in ultimate. For example: does't connect in ultimate
Seppu
Well-Known Member
i've mostly been using his parry after small juggles that only grant something like , and after bt and running punch if they start using tracking lows. so for example, small launch, , down . now you can roll to avoid a mid wake up kick and punish, or parry to avoid the low. if you don't wait for their reaction and they tech backwards, you might as well still hold down after as they have the same recovery regardless and it has that invincibility when you enter lay, so chances are you'll roll away from them, go right under their attack and surprise them with a kick to the face. out of experience though, most people like to go for the low afterwards, and when you unexpectedly parry them, they're caught off guard and are still pressing buttons because of it, giving you a free launch or stun game.
sometimes if you parry and they do a mid wake up kick though, it'll go straight through you, (despite being instantly standing) which is strange. if you do manage to get hit by a mid while parrying, you'll only suffer small damage and that worthless -9 as if you were just standing there, so it's not a big deal.
, and after bt and running punch if they start using tracking lows. so for example, small launch, , down . now you can roll to avoid a mid wake up kick and punish, or parry to avoid the low. if you don't wait for their reaction and they tech backwards, you might as well still hold down after as they have the same recovery regardless and it has that invincibility when you enter lay, so chances are you'll roll away from them, go right under their attack and surprise them with a kick to the face. out of experience though, most people like to go for the low afterwards, and when you unexpectedly parry them, they're caught off guard and are still pressing buttons because of it, giving you a free launch or stun game.sometimes if you parry and they do a mid wake up kick though, it'll go straight through you, (despite being instantly standing) which is strange. if you do manage to get hit by a mid while parrying, you'll only suffer small damage and that worthless -9 as if you were just standing there, so it's not a big deal.
you only have to hold kick for his new win pose, which would be b/circle by default. pretty lazy how he says something different in japanese though, but in english it's the same "i don't need to drink" line.
Aven Kujo-Gin
Well-Known Member
Good combo, never tried it before, but after I always use and then if the opponent doesn't tech
I always use and then if the opponent doesn't tech 
6p+k is now -3 on block 6p+kp is -6 on block. I'm pretty sure this used to be the other way around. Kinda a give and take because 6p+k was always pseudo safe because of the follow up but the follow up was easy to read/counter.
EDIT: Nevermind. That was a change from DOA4 to DOA5.
EDIT: Nevermind. That was a change from DOA4 to DOA5.
Last edited:
MasterHavik
Well-Known Member
hey guys...got a list of changes of brad in this game? It has been pretty quiet on this section of things.
MasterHavik
Well-Known Member
brad has a parry now? WTF?
MasterHavik
Well-Known Member
Someone told he's still at negative after that. Is that true?