RhythmikDesigns
Active Member
You can get oki off of bounds people, forch techs are guaranteed after them.
Must be character-specific because Zack's bounds don't.
You can get oki off of bounds people, forch techs are guaranteed after them.
How are most of you dealing with the lack of okizeme/fts/pseudo fts? :S
Well Zack is boned.It may as well not even exist.
Two of his victory subtitle quotes are switched.Popped the game in. I can tell you that Jacky can be a problem with his auto parry, and something seems off about Jann Lee's win quotes...
Gameplay-wise, I love it. It has the 3.1 feel to it. I will admit, that it was hard for me to find a ranked match, but hey: I don't play much online.
(on a side note, I was doing Ein's combo challenge and the game froze up on me. WTF?)
Hmm...interesting. Getting Zack and everyone else right now.FTs are still in the game, there just aren't anymore untechable FT setups (at least what I've heard/seen so far). I would say the core of the oki game is still there, just a tad bit different. You still can FT if your opponent decides to lay on the ground, and most of the time if your opponent tech rolls you're still at advantage. You just have to know your character, and when the latter holds true for the character your opponent is using.
Edit: I think I have seen one untechable FT setup, but not in the traditional sense. Yesterday when playing against a few Rachels, it seems I would get hit with a setup that guaranteed her heel stomp, and I believe the heel stomp leads to FT. But for traditional untechables, I believe they are all gone.
Rachel seems to have alot of things that people would want in the game, generally safe moves, guaranteed force techs, that tattoo down there with her alt (okay, that's just me). If they're going to be doing any gameplay tweaks down the line, then they should give these to more characters (and not take them away).Rachel does have untechable setups but her down attack is unique in that way. She may be the only one with guaranteed force techs.
Rachel seems to have alot of things that people would want in the game, generally safe moves, guaranteed force techs, that tattoo down there with her alt (okay, that's just me). If they're going to be doing any gameplay tweaks down the line, then they should give these to more characters (and not take them away).
Dude they are just going to pull the same they did with the stagger glitch. Let's say they do that and find out it's not what they want and start messing with it.Rachel seems to have alot of things that people would want in the game, generally safe moves, guaranteed force techs, that tattoo down there with her alt (okay, that's just me). If they're going to be doing any gameplay tweaks down the line, then they should give these to more characters (and not take them away).
Yes and no.Isn't that to be expected since this is almost a new game ?
Rachel seems to have alot of things that people would want in the game, generally safe moves, guaranteed force techs, that tattoo down there with her alt (okay, that's just me). If they're going to be doing any gameplay tweaks down the line, then they should give these to more characters (and not take them away).
I wish I could say something to this, but i don't have the game yet.That sounds nice but come patch time it's going to be nerf Rachel or pretty much redo everyone else, my moneys on nerfing Rachel.
That's actually exactly what broken means. When there's no answer to something (Akuma and the like).Something being really good, with [...] no answers, doesn't mean broken.