SilverForte
Well-Known Member
Nothing against Leon, he's the strongest man in the world, but Ryu's not exactly human.
Nothing against Leon, he's the strongest man in the world, but Ryu's not exactly human.
relax, not hitting on them, just sayin its more understandable and less awkward.Careful there
that's because the pseudogod knows better than to try! He'd get pimplapped into submission! also nearly all of Leons attacks, most of which send the opponent flying, use only one arm.And what would that be? Because I can recall Ryu sending someone a good 20 meters in the fucking air with only one arm, and I have yet to see Leon block a deathswing from a 100-meter-tall pseudo-God.
meh, I'm fine when the girls are developed and can pass for older...
Careful there
Only Rachel is half-fiend. Ryu is just a superninjaPretty much. I think it's honestly best to disqualify Ryu and Rachel because they are technically Fiends in Human Form at this point(YES, I know they are Half-Fiends, but that's still a hell of a lot more than normal to begin with).
I motion the strongest man to be Leon and the Strongest HUMAN Ninja is Kasumi in first(because it's implied sometimes Ayane may not be a full human either)
Agreed. that said, I still think Leon could disrupt and possibly reverse Ryus Izuna. have you SEEN his headbutt?Pretty much. I think it's honestly best to disqualify Ryu and Rachel because they are technically Fiends in Human Form at this point(YES, I know they are Half-Fiends, but that's still a hell of a lot more than normal to begin with).
I motion the strongest man to be Leon and the Strongest HUMAN Ninja is Kasumi in first(because it's implied sometimes Ayane may not be a full human either)
still a freak all the same.Only Rachel is half-fiend. Ryu is just a superninja
Isn't the "strongest man in the world" just some cheesy title Leon's deceased lover Lauren gave him (which he now desperately tries to achieve for her)? He isn't actually the strongest man/human in the world of DOA...
okay sorry, I have to make something clear. my opinion on this stems from the fact that I am a firm believer that teenagers should be considered and treated as what they are: Young adults, not children. at the ages when they are (or should be) driving, working, having sex, they are most certainly not children. sso if they want to dress like grown women, feel free. I was just saying when they have the body of a grown woman, its less awkward than when a late bloomer tries it. and for the record, of someone well into highschool is still considered a "child", their parents should be arrested for abuse and neglect.Okay, why was I even arguing with Argentus? XD He obviously sometimes types faster than he thinks.
okay sorry, I have to make something clear. my opinion on this stems from the fact that I am a firm believer that teenagers should be considered and treated as what they are: Young adults, not children. at the ages when they are (or should be) driving, working, having sex, they are most certainly not children. sso if they want to dress like grown women, feel free. I was just saying when they have the body of a grown woman, its less awkward than when a late bloomer tries it. and for the record, of someone well into highschool is still considered a "child", their parents should be arrested for abuse and neglect.
unfortunately, studies rarely reflect reality. put em to work, they learn how to work. tteach em to drive, they learn how to drive earlier and less chance of an accident when they get their license. don't talk down to them as if they were dumb kids, treat em normal, if they can't handler it, they aren't underdeveloped, they're just a dumbass in that particular area. they are gonna get horny, its natural quit trying to demonize it and make them embarassed. so on and so forth. But that comes down to nature vs nurture. and no, I'd go gay for Leon lol.Okay, fair enough. However, it's a common misconception that teenagers are young adults -- objectively speaking, it's false. According to studies conducted in Berkeley and Dartmouth (I think they published these studies on their webpages, not sure haha) the brain is still developing at that age -- teenagers are biologically still bread dough. For most it takes till age 25. It's a complex issue but I think it's safe to say... if you're over 25, it's not healthy to be treating someone under 18 like an adult (especially in terms of physical intimacy). Biologically speaking, (again, I know this is a long-winded answer haha) ideally parents should be treating their adolescent offspring as a mixture of child and adult. Most developmental experts would strongly advise against treating them like young adult. One should treat teenagers closer to child rather than adult on the child-adult spectrum.
It's just not conducive to their development at that point.
Long story short, if their young enough to be parented, her eyes are on her head... not her torso. Eyes up here! haha
Also:
Hyabusa is way stronger and hotter than Leon.
Heheheh okayunfortunately, studies rarely reflect reality.
its true. most studies I've ever seen, that one he just brought up being a great example, simply don't apply to real life. "treating them like a child" is how you wind up with spoiled brats who can't handle living in the real world, and don't know about or how to do anything. iI've seen it over and over. kids who are treated normally and shown how to do things and out to work grow up more mature and capable, while those whose parents try to treat them like babies all the way up past highschool, coddle, and try "developmental advice" they got from parenting books and surveys and studies, almost always resulted in the kid being developmentally stunted and immature. sstop treating em like little kids and most of the time they'll stop acting like one. theyll still be naive, but that's not the same as immature.Heheheh okay
Knowing Jann Lee players, it was probably a failed 66T.Well that's what he gets for trying to throw it instead of, you know, hold it.