KingGhidorah
Well-Known Member
You people and your OP non-sense, whatever.
Rachel General Discussion
- Thread starter Kodachi
- Start date
You people and your OP non-sense, whatever.
What a highly ironic statement.
Regardless, you still haven't provided a rhetorically sound argument, which is why I'm still unconvinced that Rachel is awesome as-is.
KingGhidorah
Well-Known Member
I've already argued this to many people on Psn and I am done doing so, end of discussion.
Give Kokoro Rachel's stomp, onegai~
KingGhidorah
Well-Known Member
I can picture her with it, and all I have to say is too good.
Drake Aldan
Well-Known Member
Actually, I'm working on Leon right now, and planning to come back to Rach when this happens.
Fighting people who can't figure out the blender is too easy. It's like a chore that does nothing to improve my holding ability.
Against people who can consistently escape, Rachel doesn't feel OP at all. But, I can probably count the number of those people on my fingers.
I am only worried that the stigma will stick after the patch.
Mai waifu doesn't deserve this.
It's okay, she'll get nerfed every single patch until she's useless, even after she's already considered bottom tier.
KingGhidorah
Well-Known Member
These idiots not being able to figure her out is all on them. If they need her patched so desperately they're merely garbage, plain and simple.
If someone needs her not patched, they're garbage.
Because you can't have highs without lows. Yin-yang concept. If something has strength, it should also have weakness. These should counter-balance each other in such a way that low-risk moves result in low payout, and high-risk moves result in high payout. No one wants an i11 unholdable mid kick sit-down stun that's neutral on block and crushes highs because it has no weakness to counter-balance it's strength (extreme hypothetical to easily illustrate point). A move like Rachel's 2K FT is very easy to set-up from most anything she does, it gives her insane pressure and has very, very little risk involved. I and some others feel like this move disproportionally weighs what should be carefully considered pros and cons. Currently, it's low-risk, high-reward, which breaks the general system that if you want a high reward, you must take a high risk performing it or trying to set it up at some point in time.
I actually do ask for buffs when the situation is flipped and a move or character has low reward for high risk. It's just that no one pays attention then and they only turn their head when it's someone asking for "nerfs." Selective listening, I suppose.
I'd rather they nerf everything she has EXCEPT 2K stomp. Keep her niche, or she'll just be another Bass.
Well, Bass' floor throw was kinda one of his big, signature things.
And no, they're quite different. Rachel has more efficient string mix-ups, lows/pokes and general safety, while Bass takes the raw OH/throw damage to 11.
Well, I more meant a character hardly anyone use.
AkaShocka
Well-Known Member
Well, I can't really say much so I'm just going to base this videos I've seen and things I heard......
Rachel doesn't really need nerfs like hell. The only thing that actually NEEDS nerfs is the + on a whiffed 2k. But what does my opinion mean to you guys anyway? I also use an "OP" character aka Ms. Bryant.
Rachel doesn't really need nerfs like hell. The only thing that actually NEEDS nerfs is the + on a whiffed 2k. But what does my opinion mean to you guys anyway? I also use an "OP" character aka Ms. Bryant.
DontForkWitMe
Well-Known Member
Funny you say that when you rage quitted on me the other day during our fight when i was dominating your Rachel with Leon...
jus sayin
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
Me 2 Awesmic, not just you. People probably still think im a scrub that plays one of the lesser characters. But you can never say I didn't try to master implied character....