I guess that's because people haven't got accustomed to her moves yet.
As I mentioned in one of the posts a few weeks ago, her 3PP/3P2K isn't that threatening.
People are not going to throw out 3PK in neutral unless he wants to do something different. Besides, 3PK only causes a knockback with damage no more than 40 so I don't even consider it.
3PP causes a knockdown with a small amount of damage, too. If one ducks to try to block lows, he gets free damage from a low throw punishment and only loses a minor amount of damage if hit by 3PP when ducking. Same can be said about retaliating immediately with i11 mids if a character has it. So on paper the relative safe option is to just block her 3P2K.
Right agreed, but you also have different factors coming into play here. For one, you are going for the offense in risk of getting hit via CH extra damage in perspective, as well as getting in proper anticipation even if you would be correct in these scenarios because those are situations where it isn't exactly properly readable (as Rikuto mentioned). 3PK is totally a risky portion from the opponent itself since the whole general move is unsafe and granting the defense player the advantage and option to simply throw it out the window.
It's just the situational needs when it varies for proper retaliation (3P2K). Now mind you that the Mai player on the offline scene via Next Level over here isn't particularly strong as of yet (so far bladez is the only one), as well as her general moves are much much easier to deal within that environment that made me change certain ideas on properly retaliation and coming up with new ways to deal with certain situations and stepping moves (we definitely need more time for Mai completely still, but some of those moves are seen quite a bit and for certain tests). It's just the thought process on when you want to properly engage such things that isn't really in the process because you are trying to commence anticipation while trying to keep your concept in play. I always believed (especially in other fighters, Alex Valle mentioned similar) is that offense interruption against built-in strings isn't the grand option to solve problems 'unless you know for sure they will do it again, as their go-to option majority of the time, and has a huge gap for reading with proper mind concept that enables you to have enough time to think.'
Not to say I disagree with you, it's the requirement for such things as well as how uncommon/rare for it to happen, along with many other factors coming into play all at the same time. I mean, if the opponent keeps doing it, by all means...i11 mid.