Wow they're really making progress.
Wow they're really making progress.
I'm reading the blog in question.Wow they're really making progress.
How do you figure that?These cryptic blogs are sounding more like they're piecing together ideas for fighting game stages so fantastical that you have to be drunk to suspend your disbelief.
And considering the standard DOA set for interactive stages, it seems like the natural evolution if that's the case. I want to make a video about this so badly, but I don't wanna jump the gun and mislead people either.
NOW he tells us.Apparently, Tomonobu Itagaki has a team in play.
LOL I was wondering when someone was going to fish this up. The way I see it is you don't have to agree with God on everything, but Itagaki doesn't really like combined worlds. I always wondered why he couldn't explain further, but he has a reason for it that he does not disclose.
The way Itagaki sees Marie Rose and Honoka doesn't surprise me because they weren't his hits, and he doesn't understand them. At first, I expected that it had something to do with Marie Rose having a small chest but seeing as how Honoka has the biggest rack in DOA, I believe it would boil down to Itagaki believing that because they are not his "daughters" he does not care about them.
When that JustAScrub guy on Discord basically dropped the bombshell on me about how crappy DOA 4's "story" is, I knew that Itagaki is just refusing to admit "I could've done this so much better than the piece of shit I made." Not to mention, survival is too easy, if you know what you're doing.The way Itagaki sees Marie Rose and Honoka doesn't surprise me because they weren't his hits, and he doesn't understand them. At first, I expected that it had something to do with Marie Rose having a small chest but seeing as how Honoka has the biggest rack in DOA, I believe it would boil down to Itagaki believing that because they are not his "daughters" he does not care about them. He said he didn't believe he could make a better fighter or a more complete fighter than [Dead or Alive 4]. Pretty sure he's done with series and will not come back to it. I think some people fantasize about it, but the reality of the situation is that it would take a Christmas miracle for KT to trust him again after successfully suing the company in 2008 (or around that time).
When that JustAScrub guy on Discord basically dropped the bombshell on me about how crappy DOA 4's "story" is, I knew that Itagaki is just refusing to admit "I could've done this so much better than the piece of shit I made." Not to mention, survival is too easy, if you know what you're doing.
He told me about how the everything up to DOA 4 is mostly just a publicly endorsed falsehood, sanctioned by DOATEC (including Victor Donovan himself, judging by Helena's dialogue in one of the cutscenes), the endings were just a cheap imitation of what Tekken already offered on the PS2, and it came across as a huge slap in the face.I don't know who JustAScrub on Discord is, but what bombshell did he drop about how bad DOA4's story is when that seriously just sounds like a subjective opinion?
He told me about how the everything up to DOA 4 is mostly just a publicly endorsed falsehood, sanctioned by DOATEC (including Victor Donovan himself, judging by Helena's dialogue in one of the cutscenes), the endings were just a cheap imitation of what Tekken already offered on the PS2, and it came across as a huge slap in the face.
First off, when has "subjective" meant "wrong"? You sound like one of those liberals who wants to lock people up over memes that happen to be politically incorrect.Sounds like you're just rehashing a subjective opinion to me.
Second of all, nice reach.Cheap would insinuate that Tekken's CGI cut scenes looked better and they weren't even close.
First off, when has "subjective" meant "wrong"? You sound like one of those liberals who wants to lock people up over memes that happen to be politically incorrect.
Second of all, nice reach.
You tell me one single character ending in DOA 4 that is even remotely this good, visually and in terms of writing.