Unless I'm missing any context your comment was blatant.
It's not that you're missing context; it's that you added context that doesn't exist. If you re-read what I wrote, you'll find that there is nothing remotely homophobic.
The DOA
community (not
in-game character roster, but the
player community) seems to have a rather high proportion of people who identify as gay relative to the general population. This means that from a statistical standpoint, they are an "over-represented" demographic. Note that my comment was in response to a speculation that TN will try to get "certain types of players [to become] interested in the game," not how many in-game characters identify as homosexual.
As for that concern, obviously "the entire spectrum of sexuality" isn't represented in DOA. It's not represented anywhere. That's a big fucking spectrum, and it would be impossible to include the entirety of it. They could make a token gay character, a token bi character, a token trans-character, etc. and you wouldn't even chip the tip of the iceberg. Is making some gay characters an inherently bad idea? No. Is it an inherently good idea either? No. Regardless,
even if I stated that gay
characters were over-represented in DOA's
roster (which I didn't), that wouldn't make me "blatantly homophobic." It would make me wrong in a very literal way if I inaccurately assessed how many characters were identified as gay, but that wouldn't necessarily mean that I held a dislike or prejudice towards gay people.
As for my original comment, I wasn't even addressing that discussion. I was simply referring to what audience(s) TN's games have appealed to. In this case, they have clearly appealed to a notable volume of gay players, regardless how many in-game characters are identified as gay. Hence, from a marketing perspective (which was the subject in question, since Banana's comment suggested that they would add certain types of characters specifically to garner interest in the game among "certain types of players"), they already have interest among that demographic. Nobody had trouble understanding this but you, because it was written quite clearly. Hence, your illiteracy.
Learn to read before you accuse people of "blatant" bigotry.